ResearchSpace

Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sitas, Nadia E
dc.contributor.author Reyers, B
dc.contributor.author Cundill, G
dc.contributor.author Prozesky, HE
dc.contributor.author Nel, JL
dc.contributor.author Esler, KJ
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-13T12:53:40Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-13T12:53:40Z
dc.date.issued 2016-04
dc.identifier.citation Sitas, N.E, Reyers, B., Cundill, G., Prozesky, H.E., Nel J.L. and Esler, K.J. 2016. Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 19, 94-102 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1877-3435
dc.identifier.uri http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343515300191
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8804
dc.description Copyright: 2016 Elsevier. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 19, 94-102 en_US
dc.description.abstract Engaging diverse stakeholders in collaborative processes to integrate environmental information into decision making is important, but challenging. It requires working at and across the boundaries between knowledge types — a complex milieu of different value systems, norms, and mental models — and multiple stakeholder-engagement processes which facilitate knowledge exchange and co-production. Using a qualitative, inductive approach, we analysed perceptions and outputs of a transdisciplinary project which aimed to generate new knowledge, awareness and action for ecosystem-based disaster management in South Africa. Several obstacles that could potentially undermine the project's objectives were identified, including: preconceived assumptions; entrenched disciplinary thinking; and confusing terminology. Enabling factors included efforts to ensure project co-creation and the use of knowledge brokers in promoting systems thinking that is grounded in practice. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;16561
dc.subject Disaster management en_US
dc.subject Ecosystem service en_US
dc.subject Knowledge exchange en_US
dc.title Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Sitas, N. E., Reyers, B., Cundill, G., Prozesky, H., Nel, J., & Esler, K. (2016). Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8804 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Sitas, Nadia E, B Reyers, G Cundill, HE Prozesky, JL Nel, and KJ Esler "Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa." (2016) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8804 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Sitas NE, Reyers B, Cundill G, Prozesky H, Nel J, Esler K. Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa. 2016; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8804. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Sitas, Nadia E AU - Reyers, B AU - Cundill, G AU - Prozesky, HE AU - Nel, JL AU - Esler, KJ AB - Engaging diverse stakeholders in collaborative processes to integrate environmental information into decision making is important, but challenging. It requires working at and across the boundaries between knowledge types — a complex milieu of different value systems, norms, and mental models — and multiple stakeholder-engagement processes which facilitate knowledge exchange and co-production. Using a qualitative, inductive approach, we analysed perceptions and outputs of a transdisciplinary project which aimed to generate new knowledge, awareness and action for ecosystem-based disaster management in South Africa. Several obstacles that could potentially undermine the project's objectives were identified, including: preconceived assumptions; entrenched disciplinary thinking; and confusing terminology. Enabling factors included efforts to ensure project co-creation and the use of knowledge brokers in promoting systems thinking that is grounded in practice. DA - 2016-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Disaster management KW - Ecosystem service KW - Knowledge exchange LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2016 SM - 1877-3435 T1 - Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa TI - Fostering collaboration for knowledge and action in disaster management in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8804 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record