ResearchSpace

Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ntshotsho, Phumza
dc.contributor.author Esler, KJ
dc.contributor.author Reyers, B
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-13T12:52:59Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-13T12:52:59Z
dc.date.issued 2015-11
dc.identifier.citation Ntshotsho, P., Esler, K.J., and Reyers, B., 2015. Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice. Sustainability 7(12), 15871-15881 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.uri http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15788/htm
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8802
dc.description Copyright: 2015 MDPI. en_US
dc.description.abstract Global acknowledgement of ecological restoration, as an important tool to complement conservation efforts, requires an effort to increase the effectiveness of restoration interventions. Evidence-based practice is purported to promote effectiveness. A central tenet of this approach is decision making that is based on evidence, not intuition. Evidence can be generated experimentally and in practice but needs to be linked to baseline information collection, clear goals and monitoring of impact. In this paper, we report on a survey conducted to assess practitioners’ perceptions of the evidence generated in restoration practice in South Africa, as well as challenges encountered in building this evidence base. Contrary to a recent assessment of this evidence base which found weaknesses, respondents viewed it as adequate and cited few obstacles to its development. Obstacles cited were mostly associated with planning and resource availability. We suggest that the disparity between practitioners’ perceptions and observed weaknesses in the evidence base could be a challenge in advancing evidence-based restoration. We explore opportunities to overcome this disparity as well as the obstacles listed by practitioners. These opportunities involve a shift from practitioners as users of scientific knowledge and evidence, to practitioners involved in the co-production of evidence needed to increase the effectiveness of restoration interventions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;16489
dc.subject Baseline information en_US
dc.subject Evidence-based practice en_US
dc.subject Impact monitoring en_US
dc.subject Practitioner perceptions en_US
dc.subject Resource limitations en_US
dc.title Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Ntshotsho, P., Esler, K., & Reyers, B. (2015). Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8802 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Ntshotsho, P, KJ Esler, and B Reyers "Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8802 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Ntshotsho P, Esler K, Reyers B. Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8802. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Ntshotsho, P AU - Esler, KJ AU - Reyers, B AB - Global acknowledgement of ecological restoration, as an important tool to complement conservation efforts, requires an effort to increase the effectiveness of restoration interventions. Evidence-based practice is purported to promote effectiveness. A central tenet of this approach is decision making that is based on evidence, not intuition. Evidence can be generated experimentally and in practice but needs to be linked to baseline information collection, clear goals and monitoring of impact. In this paper, we report on a survey conducted to assess practitioners’ perceptions of the evidence generated in restoration practice in South Africa, as well as challenges encountered in building this evidence base. Contrary to a recent assessment of this evidence base which found weaknesses, respondents viewed it as adequate and cited few obstacles to its development. Obstacles cited were mostly associated with planning and resource availability. We suggest that the disparity between practitioners’ perceptions and observed weaknesses in the evidence base could be a challenge in advancing evidence-based restoration. We explore opportunities to overcome this disparity as well as the obstacles listed by practitioners. These opportunities involve a shift from practitioners as users of scientific knowledge and evidence, to practitioners involved in the co-production of evidence needed to increase the effectiveness of restoration interventions. DA - 2015-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Baseline information KW - Evidence-based practice KW - Impact monitoring KW - Practitioner perceptions KW - Resource limitations LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 2071-1050 T1 - Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice TI - Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8802 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record