dc.contributor.author |
Coetzee, M
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Waldeck, L
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Le Roux, Alize
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Meiklejohn, C
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Van Niekerk, Cornelia W
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Leuta, T
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-11-12T07:40:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-11-12T07:40:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Coetzee, M, Waldeck, L, Le Roux, A, Meiklejohn, C, Van Niekerk, W and Leuta, T. 2014. Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure. Town and Regional Planning, Vol. 64, pp 1-9. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1012-280X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: 2014: University of the Free State (UoFS) |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This article is based on the assumption that more spatially efficient investment choices in both economic and basic infrastructure spending can make a significant impact on the equity, efficiency and sustainability of human settlements. Emerging from work conducted as part of a Department of Science and Technology (DST)-funded Integrated Planning and Development Modelling (IPDM) project, the article argues that decisions about infrastructure investment in South African metropolitan areas ought to be grounded in robust and rigorous analysis and scenario evaluation. More evidence, and better evidence, an understanding of spatial trends and the underlying forces that shape them, are needed to support planning and infrastructure investment. Urban simulation platforms offer valuable tools in this regard. Findings of simulation work in three metropolitan areas (eThekwini, Nelson Mandela Bay and Johannesburg) are presented to demonstrate this, and some implications for spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment are highlighted. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of the Free State (UoFS) |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Worklist;14693 |
|
dc.subject |
Integrated planning and development modelling |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Spatial planning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Metropolitan areas |
en_US |
dc.title |
Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Coetzee, M., Waldeck, L., Le Roux, A., Meiklejohn, C., Van Niekerk, C. W., & Leuta, T. (2014). Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Coetzee, M, L Waldeck, Alize Le Roux, C Meiklejohn, Cornelia W Van Niekerk, and T Leuta "Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities." (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Coetzee M, Waldeck L, Le Roux A, Meiklejohn C, Van Niekerk CW, Leuta T. Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Coetzee, M
AU - Waldeck, L
AU - Le Roux, Alize
AU - Meiklejohn, C
AU - Van Niekerk, Cornelia W
AU - Leuta, T
AB - This article is based on the assumption that more spatially efficient investment choices in both economic and basic infrastructure spending can make a significant impact on the equity, efficiency and sustainability of human settlements. Emerging from work conducted as part of a Department of Science and Technology (DST)-funded Integrated Planning and Development Modelling (IPDM) project, the article argues that decisions about infrastructure investment in South African metropolitan areas ought to be grounded in robust and rigorous analysis and scenario evaluation. More evidence, and better evidence, an understanding of spatial trends and the underlying forces that shape them, are needed to support planning and infrastructure investment. Urban simulation platforms offer valuable tools in this regard. Findings of simulation work in three metropolitan areas (eThekwini, Nelson Mandela Bay and Johannesburg) are presented to demonstrate this, and some implications for spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment are highlighted.
DA - 2014-05
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Integrated planning and development modelling
KW - Spatial planning
KW - Metropolitan areas
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2014
SM - 1012-280X
T1 - Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities
TI - Spatial policy, planning and infrastructure investment: lessons from urban simulations in three South African cities
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8272
ER -
|
en_ZA |