ResearchSpace

Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Leeuwen, TT
dc.contributor.author Van der Werf, GR
dc.contributor.author Hoffmann, AA
dc.contributor.author Detmers, RG
dc.contributor.author Rücker, G
dc.contributor.author French, NHF
dc.contributor.author Archibald, S
dc.contributor.author Carvalho Jr, JA
dc.contributor.author Cook, GD
dc.contributor.author De Groot, WJ
dc.contributor.author Hély, C
dc.contributor.author Kasischke, ES
dc.contributor.author Kloster, S
dc.contributor.author McCarty, JL
dc.contributor.author Pettinari, ML
dc.contributor.author Savadogo, P
dc.contributor.author Alvarado, EC
dc.contributor.author Boschetti, L
dc.contributor.author Manuri, S
dc.contributor.author Meyer, CP
dc.contributor.author Siegert, F
dc.contributor.author Trollope, LA
dc.contributor.author Trollope, WSW
dc.date.accessioned 2014-11-11T10:58:17Z
dc.date.available 2014-11-11T10:58:17Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Van Leeuwen, T.T, Van der Werf, G.R, Hoffmann, A.A, Detmers, R.G, Rücker, G, French, N.H.F, Archibald, S, Carvalho Jr, J.A, Cook, G.D, De Groot, W.J, Hély, C, Kasischke, E.S, Kloster, S, McCarty, J.L, Pettinari, M.L, Savadogo, P, Alvarado, E.C, Boschetti, L, Manuri, S, Meyer, C.P, Siegert, F, Trollope, L.A and Trollope, W.S.W. 2014. Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database. Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 11, pp 8115–8180 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1810-6277
dc.identifier.uri http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/11/8115/2014/bgd-11-8115-2014.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7767
dc.description Copyright: 2014 European Geosciences Union (EGU). This is an OA journal. The journal authorizes the publication of the information herewith contained. Published in Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 11, pp 8115–8180 en_US
dc.description.abstract Landscape fires show large variability in the amount of biomass or fuel consumed per unit area burned. These fuel consumption (FC) rates depend on the biomass available to burn and the fraction of the biomass that is actually combusted, and can be combined with estimates of area burned to assess emissions. While burned area can be detected from space and estimates are becoming more reliable due to improved algorithms and sensors, FC rates are either modeled or taken selectively from the literature. We compiled the peer-reviewed literature on FC rates for various biomes and fuel categories to better understand FC rates and variability, and to provide a database that can be used to constrain biogeochemical models with fire modules. We compiled in total 76 studies covering 10 biomes including savanna (15 studies, average FC of 4.6 t DM (dry matter) ha(sup-1)), tropical forest (n = 19, FC = 126), temperate forest (n = 11, FC = 93), boreal forest (n = 16, FC = 39), pasture (n = 6, FC = 28), crop residue (n = 4, FC = 6.5), chaparral (n = 2, FC = 32), tropical peatland (n = 4, FC = 314), boreal peatland (n = 2, FC = 42), and tundra (n = 1, FC = 40). Within biomes the regional variability in the number of measurements was sometimes large, with e.g. only 3 measurement locations in boreal Russia and 35 sites in North America. Substantial regional differences were found within the defined biomes: for example FC rates of temperate pine forests in the USA were 38% higher than Australian forests dominated by eucalypt trees. Besides showing the differences between biomes, FC estimates were also grouped into different fuel classes. Our results highlight the large variability in FC rates, not only between biomes but also within biomes and fuel classes. This implies that care should be taken with using averaged values, and our comparison with FC rates from GFED3 indicates that also modeling studies have difficulty in representing the dynamics governing FC. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher European Geosciences Union (EGU) en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;13663
dc.subject Landscape fires en_US
dc.subject Biomass fuel consumption en_US
dc.subject Savanna fires en_US
dc.subject Forrests en_US
dc.title Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Van Leeuwen, T., Van der Werf, G., Hoffmann, A., Detmers, R., Rücker, G., French, N., ... Trollope, W. (2014). Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7767 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Van Leeuwen, TT, GR Van der Werf, AA Hoffmann, RG Detmers, G Rücker, NHF French, S Archibald, et al "Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database." (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7767 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Van Leeuwen T, Van der Werf G, Hoffmann A, Detmers R, Rücker G, French N, et al. Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7767. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Van Leeuwen, TT AU - Van der Werf, GR AU - Hoffmann, AA AU - Detmers, RG AU - Rücker, G AU - French, NHF AU - Archibald, S AU - Carvalho Jr, JA AU - Cook, GD AU - De Groot, WJ AU - Hély, C AU - Kasischke, ES AU - Kloster, S AU - McCarty, JL AU - Pettinari, ML AU - Savadogo, P AU - Alvarado, EC AU - Boschetti, L AU - Manuri, S AU - Meyer, CP AU - Siegert, F AU - Trollope, LA AU - Trollope, WSW AB - Landscape fires show large variability in the amount of biomass or fuel consumed per unit area burned. These fuel consumption (FC) rates depend on the biomass available to burn and the fraction of the biomass that is actually combusted, and can be combined with estimates of area burned to assess emissions. While burned area can be detected from space and estimates are becoming more reliable due to improved algorithms and sensors, FC rates are either modeled or taken selectively from the literature. We compiled the peer-reviewed literature on FC rates for various biomes and fuel categories to better understand FC rates and variability, and to provide a database that can be used to constrain biogeochemical models with fire modules. We compiled in total 76 studies covering 10 biomes including savanna (15 studies, average FC of 4.6 t DM (dry matter) ha(sup-1)), tropical forest (n = 19, FC = 126), temperate forest (n = 11, FC = 93), boreal forest (n = 16, FC = 39), pasture (n = 6, FC = 28), crop residue (n = 4, FC = 6.5), chaparral (n = 2, FC = 32), tropical peatland (n = 4, FC = 314), boreal peatland (n = 2, FC = 42), and tundra (n = 1, FC = 40). Within biomes the regional variability in the number of measurements was sometimes large, with e.g. only 3 measurement locations in boreal Russia and 35 sites in North America. Substantial regional differences were found within the defined biomes: for example FC rates of temperate pine forests in the USA were 38% higher than Australian forests dominated by eucalypt trees. Besides showing the differences between biomes, FC estimates were also grouped into different fuel classes. Our results highlight the large variability in FC rates, not only between biomes but also within biomes and fuel classes. This implies that care should be taken with using averaged values, and our comparison with FC rates from GFED3 indicates that also modeling studies have difficulty in representing the dynamics governing FC. DA - 2014 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Landscape fires KW - Biomass fuel consumption KW - Savanna fires KW - Forrests LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2014 SM - 1810-6277 T1 - Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database TI - Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7767 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record