ResearchSpace

How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Taljaard, Susan
dc.contributor.author Van Niekerk, Lara
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-08T07:16:39Z
dc.date.available 2013-02-08T07:16:39Z
dc.date.issued 2013-03
dc.identifier.citation Taljaard, S and Van Niekerk, L. 2013. How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case. Marine Policy, vol. 38, pp 72-79 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0308-597X
dc.identifier.uri http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12001194
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6538
dc.description Copyright: Elsevier 2013. This is the Pre/Post print version of he work. The definitive version is published in Marine Policy, vol. 38, pp 72-79 en_US
dc.description.abstract Over the past six years international interest in multi-use marine spatial planning (MSP), as a practical process to launch integrated coastal management (ICM), exploded. This paper explores the extent to which existing national legal frameworks can support this process, focusing on the coastal marine environment. First the characteristics of an appropriate legal regime for multi-use MSP are explored by interrogating secondary data sourced from literature reviews and case studies. Key paradigms are distilled as a means of dissecting this complex process into a suite of characteristic determinants that disclose the underpinning environmental management approaches or principles. These criteria are then used to assess the compatibility of national legal regimes for multi-use MSP—in this instance the South African legal framework. Although multi-use MSP has not been explicitly adopted as a process within South Africa's broader ICM implementation, existing legislation does reveal support. The department responsible for the environment is viewed as the most appropriate agency to house the statutory mechanism for multi-use MSP at national and provincial levels, but delegating local multi-use MSP processes to local government agencies. The political will to deploy and dedicate duties and resources to effective implementation of multi-use MSP, however, remains critical. Finally, the approach adopted here is proposed as a means to assess the compatibility of other national legal regimes for multi-use MSP, although the suite of characteristic determinants may need to be reviewed from time to time, as new learning emerges from practice. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;10184
dc.subject Marine spatial planning en_US
dc.subject MSP en_US
dc.subject Integrated coastal management en_US
dc.subject Multi-use marine spatial planning en_US
dc.title How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Taljaard, S., & Van Niekerk, L. (2013). How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6538 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Taljaard, Susan, and Lara Van Niekerk "How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case." (2013) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6538 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Taljaard S, Van Niekerk L. How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case. 2013; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6538. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Taljaard, Susan AU - Van Niekerk, Lara AB - Over the past six years international interest in multi-use marine spatial planning (MSP), as a practical process to launch integrated coastal management (ICM), exploded. This paper explores the extent to which existing national legal frameworks can support this process, focusing on the coastal marine environment. First the characteristics of an appropriate legal regime for multi-use MSP are explored by interrogating secondary data sourced from literature reviews and case studies. Key paradigms are distilled as a means of dissecting this complex process into a suite of characteristic determinants that disclose the underpinning environmental management approaches or principles. These criteria are then used to assess the compatibility of national legal regimes for multi-use MSP—in this instance the South African legal framework. Although multi-use MSP has not been explicitly adopted as a process within South Africa's broader ICM implementation, existing legislation does reveal support. The department responsible for the environment is viewed as the most appropriate agency to house the statutory mechanism for multi-use MSP at national and provincial levels, but delegating local multi-use MSP processes to local government agencies. The political will to deploy and dedicate duties and resources to effective implementation of multi-use MSP, however, remains critical. Finally, the approach adopted here is proposed as a means to assess the compatibility of other national legal regimes for multi-use MSP, although the suite of characteristic determinants may need to be reviewed from time to time, as new learning emerges from practice. DA - 2013-03 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Marine spatial planning KW - MSP KW - Integrated coastal management KW - Multi-use marine spatial planning LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2013 SM - 0308-597X T1 - How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case TI - How supportive are existing national legal regimes for multi-use marine spatial planning?—The South African case UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6538 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record