ResearchSpace

Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Wilgen, BW
dc.contributor.author Govender, N
dc.contributor.author Forsyth, GG
dc.contributor.author Kraaij, T
dc.date.accessioned 2011-10-17T10:43:21Z
dc.date.available 2011-10-17T10:43:21Z
dc.date.issued 2011-05
dc.identifier.citation Van Wilgen, BW, Govender, N et al. 2011. Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks. Koedoe: Research Journal of the South African National Parks, Vol 53(2), 9p en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0075-6458
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5245
dc.description Copyright: 2011. The Authors. Licensee: OpenJournals Publishing. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper reviews the experience gained in three South African national parks (Kruger, Table Mountain and Bontebok) with regard to the adaptive management of fire for the conservation of biodiversity. In the Kruger National Park, adaptive approaches have evolved over the past 15 years, beginning initially as a form of ‘informed trial and error’, but progressing towards active adaptive management in which landscape-scale, experimental burning treatments are being applied in order to learn. In the process, significant advances in understanding regarding the role and management of fire have been made. Attempts have been made to transfer the approaches developed in Kruger National Park to the other two national parks. However, little progress has been made to date, both because of a failure to provide an agreed context for the introduction of adaptive approaches, and because (in the case of Bontebok National Park) too little time has passed to be able to make an assessment. Fire management interventions, ultimately, will manifest themselves in terms of biodiversity outcomes, but definite links between fire interventions and biodiversity outcomes have yet to be made. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher OpenJournals Publishing en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow request;7393
dc.subject Fire management en_US
dc.subject South African national parks en_US
dc.subject Biodiversity conservation en_US
dc.subject Biodiversity conservation en_US
dc.subject Kruger national park en_US
dc.subject Table Mountain en_US
dc.subject Bontebok national park en_US
dc.title Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Van Wilgen, B., Govender, N., Forsyth, G., & Kraaij, T. (2011). Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5245 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Van Wilgen, BW, N Govender, GG Forsyth, and T Kraaij "Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks." (2011) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5245 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Van Wilgen B, Govender N, Forsyth G, Kraaij T. Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks. 2011; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5245. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Van Wilgen, BW AU - Govender, N AU - Forsyth, GG AU - Kraaij, T AB - This paper reviews the experience gained in three South African national parks (Kruger, Table Mountain and Bontebok) with regard to the adaptive management of fire for the conservation of biodiversity. In the Kruger National Park, adaptive approaches have evolved over the past 15 years, beginning initially as a form of ‘informed trial and error’, but progressing towards active adaptive management in which landscape-scale, experimental burning treatments are being applied in order to learn. In the process, significant advances in understanding regarding the role and management of fire have been made. Attempts have been made to transfer the approaches developed in Kruger National Park to the other two national parks. However, little progress has been made to date, both because of a failure to provide an agreed context for the introduction of adaptive approaches, and because (in the case of Bontebok National Park) too little time has passed to be able to make an assessment. Fire management interventions, ultimately, will manifest themselves in terms of biodiversity outcomes, but definite links between fire interventions and biodiversity outcomes have yet to be made. DA - 2011-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Fire management KW - South African national parks KW - Biodiversity conservation KW - Biodiversity conservation KW - Kruger national park KW - Table Mountain KW - Bontebok national park LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2011 SM - 0075-6458 T1 - Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks TI - Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: experience in South African national parks UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5245 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record