ResearchSpace

Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mahumani, BK
dc.date.accessioned 2011-09-21T14:38:21Z
dc.date.available 2011-09-21T14:38:21Z
dc.date.issued 2009-03
dc.identifier.citation Thesis (MScAgric (Agricultural Economics) University of Stellenbosch, 2009. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5150
dc.identifier.uri http://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/3026/Mahumani%2c%20BK.pdf?sequence=1
dc.description Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture Department of Agricultural Economics at the Stellenbosch University en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis constitutes a socio-economic study that centres on determining the economic value of groundwater in rural and agricultural uses. Limpopo Water Management Area (WMA1) and Luvuvhu/Letaba Water Management Area (WMA2) were studied in this thesis. In WMA1 table potato irrigation in the Polokwane agricultural area was studied, while Gaphago, Leokaneng, Kanana and Mohlajeng villages were studied for rural household groundwater use. In WMA2 tomato irrigation in the Mooketsi agricultural area was studied, while Lemondokop, Sereni and Hamashamba villages were studied for rural household groundwater use. Scoping field trips to the study area as well as secondary data revealed that groundwater was the dominant water source in all these selected study epicentres. In the Polokwane agricultural area, the farms typically relied on numerous boreholes. In the Mooketsi commercial farming area, groundwater was the dominant water source for most years, except when flush floods replenished farm dams. When flush floods occurred, farmers partially substituted surface water for groundwater because of economic reasons. This study determined the economic value of groundwater in two use sectors. First, determining the utility value of groundwater in selected rural households using the contingent valuation method. Utility value was defined by Dupuit (1844) and Marshall (1879) as the maximum sacrifice expressed in money terms which each consumer would be willing to make in order to acquire an object. Open-ended questions were used to determine willingness to pay during contingent household groundwater valuation. The overall mean willingness to pay for satisfactory household groundwater for the study area was R2.28 per kilolitre of groundwater. en_US
dc.description.uri http://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/3026/Mahumani%2c%20BK.pdf?sequence=1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Thesis en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow request;3710
dc.subject Groundwater en_US
dc.subject Economic valuation en_US
dc.subject Groundwater management en_US
dc.subject Households use en_US
dc.subject Irrigation use en_US
dc.subject Agricultural economics en_US
dc.title Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region en_US
dc.type Report en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Mahumani, B. (2009). <i>Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region</i> (Workflow request;3710). Thesis. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5150 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Mahumani, BK <i>Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region.</i> Workflow request;3710. Thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5150 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Mahumani B. Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region. 2009 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5150 en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Report AU - Mahumani, BK AB - This thesis constitutes a socio-economic study that centres on determining the economic value of groundwater in rural and agricultural uses. Limpopo Water Management Area (WMA1) and Luvuvhu/Letaba Water Management Area (WMA2) were studied in this thesis. In WMA1 table potato irrigation in the Polokwane agricultural area was studied, while Gaphago, Leokaneng, Kanana and Mohlajeng villages were studied for rural household groundwater use. In WMA2 tomato irrigation in the Mooketsi agricultural area was studied, while Lemondokop, Sereni and Hamashamba villages were studied for rural household groundwater use. Scoping field trips to the study area as well as secondary data revealed that groundwater was the dominant water source in all these selected study epicentres. In the Polokwane agricultural area, the farms typically relied on numerous boreholes. In the Mooketsi commercial farming area, groundwater was the dominant water source for most years, except when flush floods replenished farm dams. When flush floods occurred, farmers partially substituted surface water for groundwater because of economic reasons. This study determined the economic value of groundwater in two use sectors. First, determining the utility value of groundwater in selected rural households using the contingent valuation method. Utility value was defined by Dupuit (1844) and Marshall (1879) as the maximum sacrifice expressed in money terms which each consumer would be willing to make in order to acquire an object. Open-ended questions were used to determine willingness to pay during contingent household groundwater valuation. The overall mean willingness to pay for satisfactory household groundwater for the study area was R2.28 per kilolitre of groundwater. DA - 2009-03 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Groundwater KW - Economic valuation KW - Groundwater management KW - Households use KW - Irrigation use KW - Agricultural economics LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 T1 - Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region TI - Rural and agricultural value of groundwater as an economic resource in the Limpopo region UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5150 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record