ResearchSpace

Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Herling, MC
dc.contributor.author Cupido, CF
dc.contributor.author O'Farrell, PJ
dc.contributor.author Du Plessis, L
dc.date.accessioned 2010-09-06T10:56:40Z
dc.date.available 2010-09-06T10:56:40Z
dc.date.issued 2009-11
dc.identifier.citation Herling, MC, Cupido, CF, O’Farrell, PJ and Du Plessis, L. 2009. Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system. Restoration Ecology, Vol.17(6), pp 827-836 en
dc.identifier.issn 1061-2971
dc.identifier.uri http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117979191/home?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4333
dc.description Copyright: 2009 Wiley-Blackwell. This is the post-print version of the work. The definitive version is published in the Restoration Ecology Journal, Vol.17(6), pp 827-836 en
dc.description.abstract Nonsustainable ostrich farming practices have degraded large areas of the Little Karoo, a semiarid region in South Africa. The Little Karoo lies within the Succulent Karoo biome, a recognized biodiversity hotspot. A financial feasibility analysis was undertaken from a private landowner’s perspective to examine the costs and benefits of rehabilitating degraded areas thereby allowing farmers to shift their production focus from ostrich to sheep farming, a financially stable and relatively conservation-compatible land use. Our aim was to raise awareness, at a private landowner level, to the opportunity costs incurred through unsustainable land use practices. We calculated and contrasted net present values for rehabilitation and no rehabilitation scenarios and investigated model sensitivities relating to seed costs, seedling survival and ostrich product prices. Rehabilitation was not found to be financially feasible for private landholders over 20 years. Seedling survival and associated seed costs were found to have strong controlling effects. Third parties need to contribute both financially and in terms of research outputs if sustainable land use practices are to be achieved in this area. This study elucidates the true costs associated with the unsustainable practice of ostrich farming and sounds a cautionary warning. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Wiley-Blackwell en
dc.subject Conservation incentives en
dc.subject Seedling survival en
dc.subject Semi arid climates en
dc.subject Nonsustainable farming practices en
dc.subject Ostrich farming en
dc.title Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation Herling, M., Cupido, C., O'Farrell, P., & Du Plessis, L. (2009). Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4333 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Herling, MC, CF Cupido, PJ O'Farrell, and L Du Plessis "Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4333 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Herling M, Cupido C, O'Farrell P, Du Plessis L. Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4333. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Herling, MC AU - Cupido, CF AU - O'Farrell, PJ AU - Du Plessis, L AB - Nonsustainable ostrich farming practices have degraded large areas of the Little Karoo, a semiarid region in South Africa. The Little Karoo lies within the Succulent Karoo biome, a recognized biodiversity hotspot. A financial feasibility analysis was undertaken from a private landowner’s perspective to examine the costs and benefits of rehabilitating degraded areas thereby allowing farmers to shift their production focus from ostrich to sheep farming, a financially stable and relatively conservation-compatible land use. Our aim was to raise awareness, at a private landowner level, to the opportunity costs incurred through unsustainable land use practices. We calculated and contrasted net present values for rehabilitation and no rehabilitation scenarios and investigated model sensitivities relating to seed costs, seedling survival and ostrich product prices. Rehabilitation was not found to be financially feasible for private landholders over 20 years. Seedling survival and associated seed costs were found to have strong controlling effects. Third parties need to contribute both financially and in terms of research outputs if sustainable land use practices are to be achieved in this area. This study elucidates the true costs associated with the unsustainable practice of ostrich farming and sounds a cautionary warning. DA - 2009-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Conservation incentives KW - Seedling survival KW - Semi arid climates KW - Nonsustainable farming practices KW - Ostrich farming LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 SM - 1061-2971 T1 - Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system TI - Financial costs of ecologically nonsustainable farming practices in a semiarid system UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4333 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record