ResearchSpace

Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bugan, Richard DH
dc.contributor.author Jovanovic, Nebojsa
dc.contributor.author De Clercq, WP
dc.contributor.author Helmschrot, J
dc.contributor.author Fluegel, WA
dc.contributor.author Leavesley, GH
dc.date.accessioned 2010-08-15T13:02:24Z
dc.date.available 2010-08-15T13:02:24Z
dc.date.issued 2009-12
dc.identifier.citation Bugan, R.D.H., Jovanovic, N., De Clercq, W.P. et al. 2009. Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa. Management of Natural Resources, Sustainable Development and Ecological Hazards, II, pp 391-402 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4148
dc.description Management of Natural Resources, Sustainable Development and Ecological Hazards, II en
dc.description.abstract The applicability of distributed hydrological models to the semi-arid conditions in the Western Cape was investigated through the application of PRMS and J2000 in the Sandspruit Catchment. The Sandspruit is an annual river, with the catchment receiving 300-400 mm/a of rainfall. The catchment exhibits shallow soils, with the dominant land uses being cultivated lands and pastures. To optimise the parameterisation of the models, 21 boreholes were drilled throughout the catchment for data collection and to get a better conceptual understanding of the catchment’s hydrologic conditions. Field evidence suggests that subsurface flow is the dominant contributor of stream flow and thus the models were calibrated accordingly. The models were run for a 20 year period. Both models were able to match the timing of seasonal hydrograph responses; however they were not able to match annual discharge volumes. Annual discharge was overestimated in certain cases and underestimated in others. Both models exhibited daily Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiencies of below 0.4. As the models were parameterised and calibrated manually, the feasibility of using automatic techniques needs to be investigated en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Sandspruit catchment en
dc.subject Hydrologic modelling en
dc.subject J2000 hydrological model en
dc.subject Semi arid climate en
dc.subject Western Cape en
dc.subject Ecological hazards en
dc.subject Natural resources en
dc.subject River catchments en
dc.title Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa en
dc.type Conference Presentation en
dc.identifier.apacitation Bugan, R. D., Jovanovic, N., De Clercq, W., Helmschrot, J., Fluegel, W., & Leavesley, G. (2009). Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4148 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Bugan, Richard DH, Nebojsa Jovanovic, WP De Clercq, J Helmschrot, WA Fluegel, and GH Leavesley. "Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa." (2009): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4148 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Bugan RD, Jovanovic N, De Clercq W, Helmschrot J, Fluegel W, Leavesley G, Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa; 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4148 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Bugan, Richard DH AU - Jovanovic, Nebojsa AU - De Clercq, WP AU - Helmschrot, J AU - Fluegel, WA AU - Leavesley, GH AB - The applicability of distributed hydrological models to the semi-arid conditions in the Western Cape was investigated through the application of PRMS and J2000 in the Sandspruit Catchment. The Sandspruit is an annual river, with the catchment receiving 300-400 mm/a of rainfall. The catchment exhibits shallow soils, with the dominant land uses being cultivated lands and pastures. To optimise the parameterisation of the models, 21 boreholes were drilled throughout the catchment for data collection and to get a better conceptual understanding of the catchment’s hydrologic conditions. Field evidence suggests that subsurface flow is the dominant contributor of stream flow and thus the models were calibrated accordingly. The models were run for a 20 year period. Both models were able to match the timing of seasonal hydrograph responses; however they were not able to match annual discharge volumes. Annual discharge was overestimated in certain cases and underestimated in others. Both models exhibited daily Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiencies of below 0.4. As the models were parameterised and calibrated manually, the feasibility of using automatic techniques needs to be investigated DA - 2009-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Sandspruit catchment KW - Hydrologic modelling KW - J2000 hydrological model KW - Semi arid climate KW - Western Cape KW - Ecological hazards KW - Natural resources KW - River catchments LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2009 T1 - Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa TI - Comparative analysis of the PRMS and J2000 hydrological models applied to the Sandspruit Catchment, Western Cape, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4148 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record