dc.contributor.author |
Loots, L
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Davel, M
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Barnard, E
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Niesler, T
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-01-08T06:38:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-01-08T06:38:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Loots, L, Davel, M et al. 2009. Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning. 20th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (PRASA). Stellenbosch, South Africa, 30 November - 01 December 2009, pp 35-40 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3851
|
|
dc.description |
20th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (PRASA). Stellenbosch, South Africa, 30 November - 01 December 2009 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Phoneme-to-phoneme (P2P) learning provides a mechanism for predicting the pronunciation of a word based on its pronunciation in a different accent, dialect or language. The authors evaluate the effectiveness of manually-developed as well as automatically derived P2P rules for British to South African English pronunciation conversion. Using the freely-available Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Contemporary English (OALD) as source, the two approaches to P2P conversion are compared to a manually-developed South African English pronunciation dictionary. The authors show that, when the British English pronunciation is known, a small manually-derived rule set is able to approximate the South African pronunciation surprisingly well. Furthermore they demonstrate that the best performance is achieved by data-driven P2P learning, which proves to be a better mechanism for pronunciation prediction than both manually-derived P2P rules as well as data-driven grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) conversion. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
PRASA 2009 |
en |
dc.subject |
Phoneme-to-phoneme learning |
en |
dc.subject |
P2P |
en |
dc.subject |
Pronunciation prediction |
en |
dc.subject |
Pronunciation conversion |
en |
dc.subject |
Grapheme-to-phoneme |
en |
dc.subject |
G2P |
en |
dc.subject |
PRASA 2009 |
en |
dc.title |
Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning |
en |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Loots, L., Davel, M., Barnard, E., & Niesler, T. (2009). Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning. PRASA 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3851 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Loots, L, M Davel, E Barnard, and T Niesler. "Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning." (2009): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3851 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Loots L, Davel M, Barnard E, Niesler T, Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning; PRASA 2009; 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3851 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Loots, L
AU - Davel, M
AU - Barnard, E
AU - Niesler, T
AB - Phoneme-to-phoneme (P2P) learning provides a mechanism for predicting the pronunciation of a word based on its pronunciation in a different accent, dialect or language. The authors evaluate the effectiveness of manually-developed as well as automatically derived P2P rules for British to South African English pronunciation conversion. Using the freely-available Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Contemporary English (OALD) as source, the two approaches to P2P conversion are compared to a manually-developed South African English pronunciation dictionary. The authors show that, when the British English pronunciation is known, a small manually-derived rule set is able to approximate the South African pronunciation surprisingly well. Furthermore they demonstrate that the best performance is achieved by data-driven P2P learning, which proves to be a better mechanism for pronunciation prediction than both manually-derived P2P rules as well as data-driven grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) conversion.
DA - 2009-11
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Phoneme-to-phoneme learning
KW - P2P
KW - Pronunciation prediction
KW - Pronunciation conversion
KW - Grapheme-to-phoneme
KW - G2P
KW - PRASA 2009
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2009
T1 - Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning
TI - Comparing manually-developed and data-driven rules for P2P learning
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3851
ER -
|
en_ZA |