The effects of selected membrane, plate and flat shell finite element formulations on optimal topologies are numerically investigated. Two different membrane components are considered. The first is a standard 4-node bilinear quadrilateral, and the other is a 4-node element accounting for in-plane (drilling) rotations. Plate elements selected for evaluation include the discrete Kirchhoff quadrilateral (DKQ) element and two Mindlin–Reissner-based elements, one employing selective reduced integration (SRI), and the other an assumed natural strain (ANS) formulation. The effect of hourglass control on SRI elements is also evaluated. The flat shell elements consist of an assemblage of these membrane and plate components. The Mindlin–Reissner elements are shown to recover the thin plate result computed using DKQ elements. However, optimal topology is shown to be dependent on plate element formulation as thickness increases. Furthermore, a new benchmark problem is introduced illustrating the deficiencies of Mindlin–Reissner elements employing SRI without hourglass control. For shell problems, elements which properly account for in-plane rotations are shown to be insensitive to the penalty parameter which enforces the relationship between in-plane rotations and displacements, in contrast to the situation when an ad hoc treatment of drilling degrees of freedom is used.
Reference:
Long, CS, Loveday, PW and Groenwold, AA. 2009. Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 45(11). pp 817-825
Long, C. S., Loveday, P. W., & Groenwold, A. (2009). Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594
Long, Craig S, Philip W Loveday, and AA Groenwold "Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594
Long CS, Loveday PW, Groenwold A. Effects of finite element formulation on optimal plate and shell structural topologies. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3594.
Copyright: 2009 Elsevier. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in the journal, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 45(11), pp 817-825
Author:Long, Craig S; Loveday, Philip W; Groenwold, AADate:Jan 2009The effects of selected planar finite element formulations, and their associated integration schemes, on the stiffness of a checkerboard material layout are investigated. Standard 4-node bilinear elements, 8- and 9-node quadratic elements, ...Read more
Author:Phan, AV; Napier, JAL; Gray, LJ; Kaplan, TDate:Dec 2003A stress intensity factor (SIF) analysis for two dimensional fractures with frictional contact (crack friction) is presented. This analysis is carried out using the symmetric-Galerkin boundary element method, and a modified quarter-point crack ...Read more
Author:Degama, MP; Forbes, ADate:Jul 2010This paper presents a beam shaping device namely, a Diffractive Optical Element (DOE), which is used to change a beam having a Gaussian intensity profile into a beam with a uniform intensity profile. The DOE used in this work was fabricated ...Read more