dc.contributor.author |
Naude, AH
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Le Maitre, David C
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Jong, T
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Forsyth, G
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mans, Gerbrand G
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hugo, W
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-02-20T09:47:18Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-02-20T09:47:18Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Naude, AH, Le Maitre, DC, De Jong, T et al. 2008. Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. International conference: Studying, modelling and sense making of planet earth. Lesvos, Greece. 1-6 June 2008, pp10 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043
|
|
dc.description |
International conference: Studying, modelling and sense making of planet earth. Lesvos, Greece. 1-6 June 2008 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The paper outlines the challenges of modelling and assessing spatially complex human-ecosystem interactions, and the need to simultaneously consider rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. The context for exploring these challenges is South Africa, which has such stark poor-rich and associated rural-urban and other spatial disparities, that it is often described as a microcosm of the global division between developed and developing countries. Instead of rigid rural-urban dichotomies and other absolute, “container” views of space, there is a need to recognise spatial overlaps and complexities such the pervasiveness of so-called translocal livelihood systems. Accordingly, much more relational, network-oriented modelling approaches are needed. The paper sets out a list of related requirements and highlights the trade-off that typically has to be made between macroscopic, multi-sector models (Type A) and sector or network specific spatial interaction models (Type B). It concludes with a discussion of ongoing work aimed at developing an adapted Type B modelling system that will provide the capability to explore positions, spaces, and interactions in terms of multiple networks (such as river networks, road networks and networks of service centres) |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Social-ecological systems |
en |
dc.subject |
Spatial-interaction modelling |
en |
dc.subject |
Rural-urban |
en |
dc.title |
Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions |
en |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Naude, A., Le Maitre, D. C., De Jong, T., Forsyth, G., Mans, G. G., & Hugo, W. (2008). Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Naude, AH, David C Le Maitre, T De Jong, G Forsyth, Gerbrand G Mans, and W Hugo. "Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions." (2008): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Naude A, Le Maitre DC, De Jong T, Forsyth G, Mans GG, Hugo W, Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Naude, AH
AU - Le Maitre, David C
AU - De Jong, T
AU - Forsyth, G
AU - Mans, Gerbrand G
AU - Hugo, W
AB - The paper outlines the challenges of modelling and assessing spatially complex human-ecosystem interactions, and the need to simultaneously consider rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. The context for exploring these challenges is South Africa, which has such stark poor-rich and associated rural-urban and other spatial disparities, that it is often described as a microcosm of the global division between developed and developing countries. Instead of rigid rural-urban dichotomies and other absolute, “container” views of space, there is a need to recognise spatial overlaps and complexities such the pervasiveness of so-called translocal livelihood systems. Accordingly, much more relational, network-oriented modelling approaches are needed. The paper sets out a list of related requirements and highlights the trade-off that typically has to be made between macroscopic, multi-sector models (Type A) and sector or network specific spatial interaction models (Type B). It concludes with a discussion of ongoing work aimed at developing an adapted Type B modelling system that will provide the capability to explore positions, spaces, and interactions in terms of multiple networks (such as river networks, road networks and networks of service centres)
DA - 2008-06
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Social-ecological systems
KW - Spatial-interaction modelling
KW - Rural-urban
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2008
T1 - Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions
TI - Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043
ER -
|
en_ZA |