ResearchSpace

Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naude, AH
dc.contributor.author Le Maitre, David C
dc.contributor.author De Jong, T
dc.contributor.author Forsyth, G
dc.contributor.author Mans, Gerbrand G
dc.contributor.author Hugo, W
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-20T09:47:18Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-20T09:47:18Z
dc.date.issued 2008-06
dc.identifier.citation Naude, AH, Le Maitre, DC, De Jong, T et al. 2008. Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. International conference: Studying, modelling and sense making of planet earth. Lesvos, Greece. 1-6 June 2008, pp10 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043
dc.description International conference: Studying, modelling and sense making of planet earth. Lesvos, Greece. 1-6 June 2008 en
dc.description.abstract The paper outlines the challenges of modelling and assessing spatially complex human-ecosystem interactions, and the need to simultaneously consider rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. The context for exploring these challenges is South Africa, which has such stark poor-rich and associated rural-urban and other spatial disparities, that it is often described as a microcosm of the global division between developed and developing countries. Instead of rigid rural-urban dichotomies and other absolute, “container” views of space, there is a need to recognise spatial overlaps and complexities such the pervasiveness of so-called translocal livelihood systems. Accordingly, much more relational, network-oriented modelling approaches are needed. The paper sets out a list of related requirements and highlights the trade-off that typically has to be made between macroscopic, multi-sector models (Type A) and sector or network specific spatial interaction models (Type B). It concludes with a discussion of ongoing work aimed at developing an adapted Type B modelling system that will provide the capability to explore positions, spaces, and interactions in terms of multiple networks (such as river networks, road networks and networks of service centres) en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Social-ecological systems en
dc.subject Spatial-interaction modelling en
dc.subject Rural-urban en
dc.title Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions en
dc.type Conference Presentation en
dc.identifier.apacitation Naude, A., Le Maitre, D. C., De Jong, T., Forsyth, G., Mans, G. G., & Hugo, W. (2008). Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Naude, AH, David C Le Maitre, T De Jong, G Forsyth, Gerbrand G Mans, and W Hugo. "Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions." (2008): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Naude A, Le Maitre DC, De Jong T, Forsyth G, Mans GG, Hugo W, Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Naude, AH AU - Le Maitre, David C AU - De Jong, T AU - Forsyth, G AU - Mans, Gerbrand G AU - Hugo, W AB - The paper outlines the challenges of modelling and assessing spatially complex human-ecosystem interactions, and the need to simultaneously consider rural-urban and rich-poor interactions. The context for exploring these challenges is South Africa, which has such stark poor-rich and associated rural-urban and other spatial disparities, that it is often described as a microcosm of the global division between developed and developing countries. Instead of rigid rural-urban dichotomies and other absolute, “container” views of space, there is a need to recognise spatial overlaps and complexities such the pervasiveness of so-called translocal livelihood systems. Accordingly, much more relational, network-oriented modelling approaches are needed. The paper sets out a list of related requirements and highlights the trade-off that typically has to be made between macroscopic, multi-sector models (Type A) and sector or network specific spatial interaction models (Type B). It concludes with a discussion of ongoing work aimed at developing an adapted Type B modelling system that will provide the capability to explore positions, spaces, and interactions in terms of multiple networks (such as river networks, road networks and networks of service centres) DA - 2008-06 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Social-ecological systems KW - Spatial-interaction modelling KW - Rural-urban LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2008 T1 - Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions TI - Modelling of spatially complex human-ecosystem, rural-urban and rich-poor interactions UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3043 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record