ResearchSpace

Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Murray, K en_US
dc.contributor.author Claassen, Marius en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-03-26T12:14:05Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-06-07T10:08:13Z
dc.date.available 2007-03-26T12:14:05Z en_US
dc.date.available 2007-06-07T10:08:13Z
dc.date.copyright en_US
dc.date.issued 1999-10 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Murray, K. and Claassen, M. 1999. Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines. Water SA, vol. 25(4), pp 513-518 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064
dc.description.abstract In order to facilitate a common understanding, on-going debate and increasing application of ecological risk assessment (ERA) in South Africa, the ERA process of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been summarised and evaluated for South African conditions, Many of the individual steps in the process have been interpreted and reworded in order to improve communication of the concepts. The basic process is unchanged though a few minor changes are recommended as improvements. A comparison is also made with integrated environmental management (IEM). It is noted that ERA addresses many of the key principles underpinning IEM, including consultation with interested and affected parties which provides an opportunity for public and specialist input into the decision-making process. However, there are some differences though more in degree than in principle. Of importance is that the ERA framework provides explicitly for quantification of all aspects of an assessment in an IEM procedure. en_US
dc.format.extent 52054 bytes en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en_US
dc.rights Copyright: 1999 Water Research Commission en_US
dc.source en_US
dc.subject US Environmental protection agency en_US
dc.subject EPA en_US
dc.subject Ecological risk assessment en_US
dc.subject ERA process en_US
dc.subject Integrated environmental management en_US
dc.subject IEM en_US
dc.subject Ecological risks guidelines en_US
dc.subject Water resources en_US
dc.title Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Murray, K., & Claassen, M. (1999). Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Murray, K, and Marius Claassen "Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines." (1999) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Murray K, Claassen M. Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines. 1999; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Murray, K AU - Claassen, Marius AB - In order to facilitate a common understanding, on-going debate and increasing application of ecological risk assessment (ERA) in South Africa, the ERA process of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been summarised and evaluated for South African conditions, Many of the individual steps in the process have been interpreted and reworded in order to improve communication of the concepts. The basic process is unchanged though a few minor changes are recommended as improvements. A comparison is also made with integrated environmental management (IEM). It is noted that ERA addresses many of the key principles underpinning IEM, including consultation with interested and affected parties which provides an opportunity for public and specialist input into the decision-making process. However, there are some differences though more in degree than in principle. Of importance is that the ERA framework provides explicitly for quantification of all aspects of an assessment in an IEM procedure. DA - 1999-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - US Environmental protection agency KW - EPA KW - Ecological risk assessment KW - ERA process KW - Integrated environmental management KW - IEM KW - Ecological risks guidelines KW - Water resources LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 1999 SM - 0378-4738 T1 - Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines TI - Interpretation and evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency ecological risk assessment guidelines UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2064 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record