dc.contributor.author |
Scholes, RJ
|
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Biggs, R
|
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-03-26T07:06:26Z |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-06-07T10:08:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-03-26T07:06:26Z |
en_US |
dc.date.available |
2007-06-07T10:08:26Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2005-03-03 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Scholes, RJ and Biggs, R. 2005. Biodiversity intactness index. Nature, vol. 434(7029), pp 45-49 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0028-0836 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026
|
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
The nations of the world have set themselves a target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. Here, we propose a biodiversity intactness index (BII) for assessing progress towards this target that is simple and practical - but sensitive to important factors that influence biodiversity status - and which satisfies the criteria for policy relevance set by the Convention on Biological Diversity. Application of the BII is demonstrated on a large region (4 3 10 6 km 2) of southern Africa. The BII score in the year 2000 is about 84%: in other words, averaged across all plant and vertebrate species in the region, populations have declined to 84% of their presumed pre-modern levels. The taxonomic group with the greatest loss is mammals, at 71% of pre-modern levels, and the ecosystem type with the greatest loss is grassland, with 74% of its former populations remaining. During the 1990s, a population decline of 0.8% is estimated to have occurred. |
en_US |
dc.format.extent |
187473 bytes |
en_US |
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Copyright: 2005 Nature Publishing Group |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Biodiversity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Biodiversity intactness index |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Biological diversity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ecosystems |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Taxonomic group |
en_US |
dc.title |
Biodiversity intactness index |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Scholes, R., & Biggs, R. (2005). Biodiversity intactness index. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Scholes, RJ, and R Biggs "Biodiversity intactness index." (2005) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Scholes R, Biggs R. Biodiversity intactness index. 2005; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Scholes, RJ
AU - Biggs, R
AB - The nations of the world have set themselves a target of reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. Here, we propose a biodiversity intactness index (BII) for assessing progress towards this target that is simple and practical - but sensitive to important factors that influence biodiversity status - and which satisfies the criteria for policy relevance set by the Convention on Biological Diversity. Application of the BII is demonstrated on a large region (4 3 10 6 km 2) of southern Africa. The BII score in the year 2000 is about 84%: in other words, averaged across all plant and vertebrate species in the region, populations have declined to 84% of their presumed pre-modern levels. The taxonomic group with the greatest loss is mammals, at 71% of pre-modern levels, and the ecosystem type with the greatest loss is grassland, with 74% of its former populations remaining. During the 1990s, a population decline of 0.8% is estimated to have occurred.
DA - 2005-03-03
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Biodiversity intactness index
KW - Biological diversity
KW - Ecosystems
KW - Taxonomic group
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2005
SM - 0028-0836
T1 - Biodiversity intactness index
TI - Biodiversity intactness index
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2026
ER -
|
en_ZA |