ResearchSpace

Sustainability Handbook Volume 8

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author De Jager, Peta
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-19T08:03:46Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-19T08:03:46Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01
dc.identifier.citation De Jager, P. 2024. <i>Sustainability Handbook Volume 8</i>. s.l.:Alive2Green. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649. en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 978 0 620 45240 3
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649
dc.description.abstract Given that cement is the third most utilized material following sand and water and its manufacture contributes an estimated 6% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, there is a need to consider recyclability, life cycle environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Materials science takes front stage in this volume with research and industry investigating technologies which can reduce its negative impacts. Amongst contemporary challenges faced by concrete, is the durability of the material in infrastructure. Geopolymers represent a valuable addition to the expanding array of cementitious materials, which serve as primary inputs in concrete production. UCT joins hands with the CSIR to build on international research in this field, testing mineral acid resistance in both static and dynamic conditions, for - amongst others - sewer applications. Dumani and Mapiravana report on their cradle-to-gate environmental life cycle assessment of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), which shows it to be a very promising alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement. In other work, in quantifying the environmental impacts of a sustainable concrete mix for a block paving system, researchers find that replacing cement with fly ash, beyond 35%, as stipulated in the national cement specification for common cements, presents a significant opportunity to reduce environmental impacts without (necessarily) compromising strength. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Alive2Green en_US
dc.relation.uri https://sustainability-handbook.alive2green.co.za/magazine/vol8/ en_US
dc.subject Green buildings en_US
dc.subject Construction materials en_US
dc.subject Sustainable buildings en_US
dc.title Sustainability Handbook Volume 8 en_US
dc.type Book en_US
dc.description.edition Volume 8 en_US
dc.description.pages 190 en_US
dc.description.placeofpublication Cape Town en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea FBI Management Area en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation De Jager, P. (2024). <i>Sustainability Handbook Volume 8</i>. Alive2Green. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation De Jager, Peta. <i>Sustainability Handbook Volume 8</i>. n.p.: Alive2Green. 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649. en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation De Jager P. Sustainability Handbook Volume 8. [place unknown]: Alive2Green; 2024.http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649 en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Book AU - De Jager, Peta AB - Given that cement is the third most utilized material following sand and water and its manufacture contributes an estimated 6% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, there is a need to consider recyclability, life cycle environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Materials science takes front stage in this volume with research and industry investigating technologies which can reduce its negative impacts. Amongst contemporary challenges faced by concrete, is the durability of the material in infrastructure. Geopolymers represent a valuable addition to the expanding array of cementitious materials, which serve as primary inputs in concrete production. UCT joins hands with the CSIR to build on international research in this field, testing mineral acid resistance in both static and dynamic conditions, for - amongst others - sewer applications. Dumani and Mapiravana report on their cradle-to-gate environmental life cycle assessment of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), which shows it to be a very promising alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement. In other work, in quantifying the environmental impacts of a sustainable concrete mix for a block paving system, researchers find that replacing cement with fly ash, beyond 35%, as stipulated in the national cement specification for common cements, presents a significant opportunity to reduce environmental impacts without (necessarily) compromising strength. DA - 2024-01 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Green buildings KW - Construction materials KW - Sustainable buildings LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2024 SM - 978 0 620 45240 3 T1 - Sustainability Handbook Volume 8 TI - Sustainability Handbook Volume 8 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13649 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 27691 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record