ResearchSpace

Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Matebese, Belinda T
dc.contributor.author Withey, Daniel J
dc.contributor.author Banda, MK
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-06T08:43:28Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-06T08:43:28Z
dc.date.issued 2020-09
dc.identifier.citation Matebese, B.T., Withey, D.J. & Banda, M. 2020. Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-4503-7558-0
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1145/3415088.3415122
dc.identifier.uri https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3415088
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943
dc.description.abstract The motion planning for a mobile, autonomous system is solved using the Leapfrog algorithm from optimal control. Numerical optimal control has some advantages for motion planning. Differential constraints can be included in the problem formulation, and it is relatively simple to change the performance index and the nonlinear system model. The proposed algorithm finds a collision-free path for a cost functional under nonlinear differential constraints. Numerical case studies are done to show the effectiveness and efficiency of the Leapfrog algorithm and are compared with the kinodynamic-RRT* algorithm, in which optimal control is also used, but employed in a piecewise manner, between randomly-selected nodes. Path cost and execution time are used for performance comparison. The simulation results show that the Leapfrog method produces less jagged and shorter paths with smaller path cost and lower execution time compared to kinodynamic-RRT*, indicating suitability of the Leapfrog algorithm for motion planning in mobile, autonomous systems. en_US
dc.format Abstract en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.source ICONIC '20: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, Virtual, 24 September 2020 en_US
dc.subject Leapfrog algorithm en_US
dc.subject Kinodynamic-RRT* en_US
dc.subject Optimal controlt en_US
dc.subject Path planning en_US
dc.subject Mobile robot en_US
dc.title Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.description.pages 7pp en_US
dc.description.note Copyright: 2020 ACM. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file contains the abstract of the full-text item. For access to the full-text item, please consult the publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1145/3415088.3415122 en_US
dc.description.cluster Manufacturing
dc.description.impactarea MIAS en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Matebese, B. T., Withey, D. J., & Banda, M. (2020). Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Matebese, Belinda T, Daniel J Withey, and MK Banda. "Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning." <i>ICONIC '20: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, Virtual, 24 September 2020</i> (2020): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Matebese BT, Withey DJ, Banda M, Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning; 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Matebese, Belinda T AU - Withey, Daniel J AU - Banda, MK AB - The motion planning for a mobile, autonomous system is solved using the Leapfrog algorithm from optimal control. Numerical optimal control has some advantages for motion planning. Differential constraints can be included in the problem formulation, and it is relatively simple to change the performance index and the nonlinear system model. The proposed algorithm finds a collision-free path for a cost functional under nonlinear differential constraints. Numerical case studies are done to show the effectiveness and efficiency of the Leapfrog algorithm and are compared with the kinodynamic-RRT* algorithm, in which optimal control is also used, but employed in a piecewise manner, between randomly-selected nodes. Path cost and execution time are used for performance comparison. The simulation results show that the Leapfrog method produces less jagged and shorter paths with smaller path cost and lower execution time compared to kinodynamic-RRT*, indicating suitability of the Leapfrog algorithm for motion planning in mobile, autonomous systems. DA - 2020-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - ICONIC '20: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, Virtual, 24 September 2020 KW - Leapfrog algorithm KW - Kinodynamic-RRT* KW - Optimal controlt KW - Path planning KW - Mobile robot LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2020 SM - 978-1-4503-7558-0 T1 - Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning TI - Leapfrog and optimal kinodynamic motion planning UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11943 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 24042 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record