ResearchSpace

Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Genthe, Bettina
dc.contributor.author Ndlela, Luyanda L
dc.contributor.author Madlala, Tebogo
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-29T09:14:52Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-29T09:14:52Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.identifier.citation Genthe, B., Ndlela, L.L. & Madlala, T. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective. <i>Journal of Water and Health, 18(6).</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1477-8920
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920
dc.description.abstract According to the Centre for Disease Dynamics Economics and Policy, South Africa represents a paradox of antibiotic management similar to other developing countries, with both overuse and underuse (resulting from lack of access) of antibiotics. In addition, wastewater reuse may contribute towards antibiotic resistance through selective pressure that increases resistance in native bacteria and on clinically relevant bacteria, increasing resistance profiles of the common pathogens. Sediments of surface water bodies and wastewater sludge provide a place where antibiotic resistance genes are transferred to other bacteria. Crop irrigation is thought to be a potential source of exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria through the transfer from the water or sludge into crops. The objectives of this study were to examine the antibiotic-resistance profiles of Escherishia coli from three agricultural locations in the Western Cape, South Africa. Using a classical microbiology culture approach, the resistance profiles of E. coli species isolated from river water and sediments, farm dams and their sediments and a passive algal wastewater treatment ponds and sediment used for crop irrigation were assessed for resistance to 13 commonly used antibiotics. Randomly selected E. coli isolates from the sediment and water were tested for resistance. 100% of E. coli isolates were resistant to sulphamethoxazole, highlighting its relevance in the South African context. In river water and farm dam samples, only the E. coli isolated from sediment were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolone or fluorifenicol. In the wastewater treatment ponds, the resistance profiles of E. coli isolated from sediments differed from those isolated from effluent, with 90% of the effluent isolates being resistant to ampicillin. Isolates from the sediment were less resistant (40%) to ampicillin, whereas all the isolates from the pond water and sediment samples were resistant to sulphamethoxazole. These results illustrate the importance of developing a better understanding of antibiotic resistance in agriculture and wastewater scenarios to ensure remedial measures take place where the greatest benefit can be realised especially in countries with limited financial and infrastructural resources. Moreover, the potential for passive algal treatment as an effective, feasible alternative for wastewater treatment is highlighted, with comparable resistance profiles and a reducing overall resistance in the sediment samples. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2020.034 en_US
dc.relation.uri https://iwaponline.com/jwh/article/18/6/925/77779/Antimicrobial-resistance-screening-and-profiles-a en_US
dc.source Journal of Water and Health, 18(6) en_US
dc.subject Agriculture irrigation water en_US
dc.subject Antibiotic resistant bacteria en_US
dc.subject E. coli en_US
dc.subject River water en_US
dc.subject Sediment en_US
dc.subject Wastewater en_US
dc.title Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 925–936 en_US
dc.description.note This paper is Open Access via a Subscribe to Open model. en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea Integr Water Anal & Solutions en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Genthe, B., Ndlela, L. L., & Madlala, T. (2020). Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective. <i>Journal of Water and Health, 18(6)</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Genthe, Bettina, Luyanda L Ndlela, and Tebogo Madlala "Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective." <i>Journal of Water and Health, 18(6)</i> (2020) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Genthe B, Ndlela LL, Madlala T. Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective. Journal of Water and Health, 18(6). 2020; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Genthe, Bettina AU - Ndlela, Luyanda L AU - Madlala, Tebogo AB - According to the Centre for Disease Dynamics Economics and Policy, South Africa represents a paradox of antibiotic management similar to other developing countries, with both overuse and underuse (resulting from lack of access) of antibiotics. In addition, wastewater reuse may contribute towards antibiotic resistance through selective pressure that increases resistance in native bacteria and on clinically relevant bacteria, increasing resistance profiles of the common pathogens. Sediments of surface water bodies and wastewater sludge provide a place where antibiotic resistance genes are transferred to other bacteria. Crop irrigation is thought to be a potential source of exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria through the transfer from the water or sludge into crops. The objectives of this study were to examine the antibiotic-resistance profiles of Escherishia coli from three agricultural locations in the Western Cape, South Africa. Using a classical microbiology culture approach, the resistance profiles of E. coli species isolated from river water and sediments, farm dams and their sediments and a passive algal wastewater treatment ponds and sediment used for crop irrigation were assessed for resistance to 13 commonly used antibiotics. Randomly selected E. coli isolates from the sediment and water were tested for resistance. 100% of E. coli isolates were resistant to sulphamethoxazole, highlighting its relevance in the South African context. In river water and farm dam samples, only the E. coli isolated from sediment were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolone or fluorifenicol. In the wastewater treatment ponds, the resistance profiles of E. coli isolated from sediments differed from those isolated from effluent, with 90% of the effluent isolates being resistant to ampicillin. Isolates from the sediment were less resistant (40%) to ampicillin, whereas all the isolates from the pond water and sediment samples were resistant to sulphamethoxazole. These results illustrate the importance of developing a better understanding of antibiotic resistance in agriculture and wastewater scenarios to ensure remedial measures take place where the greatest benefit can be realised especially in countries with limited financial and infrastructural resources. Moreover, the potential for passive algal treatment as an effective, feasible alternative for wastewater treatment is highlighted, with comparable resistance profiles and a reducing overall resistance in the sediment samples. DA - 2020-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - Journal of Water and Health, 18(6) KW - Agriculture irrigation water KW - Antibiotic resistant bacteria KW - E. coli KW - River water KW - Sediment KW - Wastewater LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2020 SM - 1477-8920 T1 - Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective TI - Antimicrobial resistance screening and profiles: A glimpse from the South African perspective UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11920 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 24327 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record