ResearchSpace

Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Oluwatobi, JA
dc.contributor.author Mabuza-Hocquet, Gugulethu P
dc.contributor.author Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo V
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-09T10:56:54Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-09T10:56:54Z
dc.date.issued 2019-12
dc.identifier.citation Oluwatobi, J.A., Mabuza-Hocquet, G.P. and Nelwamondo, F.V. 2019. Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets. 19th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Pretoria, South Africa, 3-5 December 2019 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-3-030-49341-7
dc.identifier.isbn 978-3-030-49342-4
dc.identifier.uri https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-49342-4_27
dc.identifier.uri DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49342-4_27
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11694
dc.description © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. The attached pdf is the accepted version of the published paper. For access to the the published version, kindly visit https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-49342-4_27 en_US
dc.description.abstract The ISNT rule is a technique that has been used to detect glaucoma from fundus im-ages. The rule states that for a healthy fundus image, the segmented optic disc can be divided into four neuro-retina rim quadrants namely; the Inferior, Superior, Nasal and Temporal neuro- retina rims. The Inferior is the widest followed by the Superior then the Nasal. The Temporal quadrant is the least. However, since the advent of the rule there have been several experiments that prove the inefficiency of the rule to diagnose glaucoma while other experiments argue that the rule is efficient. Experiments carried out by individuals were done using dataset sourced by the individuals not on publicly available fundus datasets. This makes the experiments not easily reproducible. This work assesses the ISNT rule using the RIM-ONE v3 dataset and the DRISHTI-GS dataset which are both publicly available datasets. The performance of the ISNT rule on the datasets is compared with the performance of a trained Extreme Gradient Boost classifier (XGB). The results show that the XGB classifier outperforms the ISNT rule and its variant. The ISNT rule demonstrated a random performance on the databases used. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;23036
dc.subject Retinal Fundus Image en_US
dc.subject Glaucoma en_US
dc.subject ISNT en_US
dc.subject Blood vessel segmentation en_US
dc.subject Image segmentation en_US
dc.title Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Oluwatobi, J., Mabuza-Hocquet, G. P., & Nelwamondo, F. V. (2019). Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets. Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11694 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Oluwatobi, JA, Gugulethu P Mabuza-Hocquet, and Fulufhelo V Nelwamondo. "Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets." (2019): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11694 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Oluwatobi J, Mabuza-Hocquet GP, Nelwamondo FV, Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets; Springer; 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11694 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Oluwatobi, JA AU - Mabuza-Hocquet, Gugulethu P AU - Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo V AB - The ISNT rule is a technique that has been used to detect glaucoma from fundus im-ages. The rule states that for a healthy fundus image, the segmented optic disc can be divided into four neuro-retina rim quadrants namely; the Inferior, Superior, Nasal and Temporal neuro- retina rims. The Inferior is the widest followed by the Superior then the Nasal. The Temporal quadrant is the least. However, since the advent of the rule there have been several experiments that prove the inefficiency of the rule to diagnose glaucoma while other experiments argue that the rule is efficient. Experiments carried out by individuals were done using dataset sourced by the individuals not on publicly available fundus datasets. This makes the experiments not easily reproducible. This work assesses the ISNT rule using the RIM-ONE v3 dataset and the DRISHTI-GS dataset which are both publicly available datasets. The performance of the ISNT rule on the datasets is compared with the performance of a trained Extreme Gradient Boost classifier (XGB). The results show that the XGB classifier outperforms the ISNT rule and its variant. The ISNT rule demonstrated a random performance on the databases used. DA - 2019-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Retinal Fundus Image KW - Glaucoma KW - ISNT KW - Blood vessel segmentation KW - Image segmentation LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2019 SM - 978-3-030-49341-7 SM - 978-3-030-49342-4 T1 - Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets TI - Assessment of the ISNT rule on publicly available datasets UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11694 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record