ResearchSpace

Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gibberd, Jeremy T
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-05T11:26:44Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-05T11:26:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019-05
dc.identifier.citation Gibberd, J.2019. Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently? Sustainable Urbanisation of the South Africa Sweden Universities Forum (SASUF) 2019 Symposium, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 6-10 May 2019, 12pp. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-928472-12-4
dc.identifier.uri https://sasuf2019.mandela.ac.za
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11690
dc.description Copyright: 2019 Nelson Mandela University. This is the fulltext version of the work. en_US
dc.description.abstract Climate change is already having significant impacts globally. These impacts are experienced most acutely in developing countries where infrastructure and population are often more vulnerable and resources and capacity for mitigation are limited. It is therefore particularly important to understand vulnerabilities to climate change in developing countries and address these in the most effective and efficient ways possible. The Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) was created to guide the development of more sustainable neighbourhoods in developing countries. Through analysis of current climatic change projections for South Africa, key implications for neighbourhoods are ascertained. These are reviewed against criteria in the BEST to investigate whether the tool adequately addresses projected climate changes and promotes associated resilience measures. Findings from the study indicate that while the BEST provides a useful guide for addressing sustainability in neighbourhoods it could be enhanced by addressing resilience more comprehensively. Recommendations are therefore made for the further development of the BEST. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Nelson Mandela University en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;23295
dc.subject Resilience en_US
dc.subject Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Sustainable Building Assessment Tool en_US
dc.subject SBAT en_US
dc.title Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently? en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Gibberd, J. (2019). Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently?. Nelson Mandela University. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11690 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Gibberd, Jeremy. "Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently?." (2019): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11690 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Gibberd J, Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently?; Nelson Mandela University; 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11690 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Gibberd, Jeremy AB - Climate change is already having significant impacts globally. These impacts are experienced most acutely in developing countries where infrastructure and population are often more vulnerable and resources and capacity for mitigation are limited. It is therefore particularly important to understand vulnerabilities to climate change in developing countries and address these in the most effective and efficient ways possible. The Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) was created to guide the development of more sustainable neighbourhoods in developing countries. Through analysis of current climatic change projections for South Africa, key implications for neighbourhoods are ascertained. These are reviewed against criteria in the BEST to investigate whether the tool adequately addresses projected climate changes and promotes associated resilience measures. Findings from the study indicate that while the BEST provides a useful guide for addressing sustainability in neighbourhoods it could be enhanced by addressing resilience more comprehensively. Recommendations are therefore made for the further development of the BEST. DA - 2019-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Resilience KW - Sustainability KW - Sustainable Building Assessment Tool KW - SBAT LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2019 SM - 978-1-928472-12-4 T1 - Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently? TI - Does the Built Environment Sustainability Tool (BEST) address resilience sufficiently? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11690 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record