ResearchSpace

Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manickchand, Kaveer
dc.contributor.author Strydom, Johannes J
dc.contributor.author Mishra, AK
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-12T07:40:10Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-12T07:40:10Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09
dc.identifier.citation Manickchand, K., Strydom, J.J., Mishra, A.K. 2017. Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Africon Conference, 18-20 September 2017, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 221-226. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8095485/
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10786
dc.description Copyright: 2017 IEEE. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, kindly consult the publisher's website. en_US
dc.description.abstract The goal of this study was to research TOA exclusive tracking and deinterleaving algorithms applied to radar emitters in an EW environment for application on FPGA-based DRFM platforms. In this paper sequence search (SS), TOA difference histogram, CDIF, SDIF, CDIF with SS (CDIF SS) and SDIF with SS (SDIF SS) deinterleaving algorithms were investigated. The TOA tracking algorithms that were investigated were the Delta-t histogram, alpha-beta filter and Kalman filter. The performance of all the algorithms were evaluated within a simulated EW environment, in which TOA measurement noise, number of emitters and interference pulses (missing and spurious) were varied. The work has shown that the best performing deinterleaving algorithms in simulations were found to be the CDIF & CDIF SS algorithms. These deinterleaving algorithms performed consistently well compared to the other algorithms in all the tested scenarios. The best performing tracking algorithms in simulations were found to be the Delta-t histogram & alphabeta filter algorithms. These two algorithms were favoured over the Kalman filter as the increase in performance could not justify the longer processing time. Final comparison on the FPGAbased hardware platforms showed that the CDIF SS was the best deinterleaving algorithm and the best tracking algorithm was the alpha-beta filter. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;20977
dc.subject Deinterleaving en_US
dc.subject Emitter tracking en_US
dc.subject PRI estimation en_US
dc.subject FPGA en_US
dc.subject TOA prediction en_US
dc.subject Missing pulses en_US
dc.subject Spurious pulses en_US
dc.subject Alphabeta en_US
dc.subject Kalman en_US
dc.subject CDIF en_US
dc.subject SDIF en_US
dc.subject Sequence search en_US
dc.title Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Manickchand, K., Strydom, J. J., & Mishra, A. (2017). Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms. IEEE. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10786 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Manickchand, Kaveer, Johannes J Strydom, and AK Mishra. "Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms." (2017): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10786 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Manickchand K, Strydom JJ, Mishra A, Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms; IEEE; 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10786 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Manickchand, Kaveer AU - Strydom, Johannes J AU - Mishra, AK AB - The goal of this study was to research TOA exclusive tracking and deinterleaving algorithms applied to radar emitters in an EW environment for application on FPGA-based DRFM platforms. In this paper sequence search (SS), TOA difference histogram, CDIF, SDIF, CDIF with SS (CDIF SS) and SDIF with SS (SDIF SS) deinterleaving algorithms were investigated. The TOA tracking algorithms that were investigated were the Delta-t histogram, alpha-beta filter and Kalman filter. The performance of all the algorithms were evaluated within a simulated EW environment, in which TOA measurement noise, number of emitters and interference pulses (missing and spurious) were varied. The work has shown that the best performing deinterleaving algorithms in simulations were found to be the CDIF & CDIF SS algorithms. These deinterleaving algorithms performed consistently well compared to the other algorithms in all the tested scenarios. The best performing tracking algorithms in simulations were found to be the Delta-t histogram & alphabeta filter algorithms. These two algorithms were favoured over the Kalman filter as the increase in performance could not justify the longer processing time. Final comparison on the FPGAbased hardware platforms showed that the CDIF SS was the best deinterleaving algorithm and the best tracking algorithm was the alpha-beta filter. DA - 2017-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Deinterleaving KW - Emitter tracking KW - PRI estimation KW - FPGA KW - TOA prediction KW - Missing pulses KW - Spurious pulses KW - Alphabeta KW - Kalman KW - CDIF KW - SDIF KW - Sequence search LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2017 T1 - Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms TI - Comparative study of TOA based emitter deinterleaving and tracking algorithms UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10786 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record