ResearchSpace

Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Du Plessis, A
dc.contributor.author Sperling, P
dc.contributor.author Beerlink, A
dc.contributor.author Kruger, O
dc.contributor.author Tshabalala, Lerato C
dc.contributor.author Hoosain, Shaik E
dc.contributor.author Le Roux, SG
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-05T10:23:34Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-05T10:23:34Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09
dc.identifier.citation Du Plessis, A. et al. 2018. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness. MethodsX, vol. 5: 1111-1116 en_US
dc.identifier.issn MethodsX
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.004
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016118301468?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10447
dc.description Open access article published in MethodsX, vol. 5: 1111-1116 en_US
dc.description.abstract The use of microCT of 10 mm coupon samples produced by AM has the potential to provide useful information of mean density and detailed porosity information of the interior of the samples. In addition, the same scan data can be used to provide surface roughness analysis of the as-built surfaces of the same coupon samples. This can be used to compare process parameters or new materials. While surface roughness is traditionally done using tactile probes or with non-contact interferometric techniques, the complex surfaces in AM are sometimes difficult to access and may be very rough, with undercuts and may be difficult to accurately measure using traditional techniques which are meant for smoother surfaces. This standard workflow demonstrates on a coupon sample how to acquire surface roughness results, and compares the results from roughly the same area of the same sample with tactile probe results. The same principle can be applied to more complex parts, keeping in mind the resolution limit vs sample size of microCT. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;21422
dc.subject X-ray tomography en_US
dc.subject MicroCT en_US
dc.subject Nondestructive testing en_US
dc.subject Additive manufacturing en_US
dc.subject Quality control en_US
dc.subject Surface roughness en_US
dc.title Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Du Plessis, A., Sperling, P., Beerlink, A., Kruger, O., Tshabalala, L. C., Hoosain, S. E., & Le Roux, S. (2018). Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10447 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Du Plessis, A, P Sperling, A Beerlink, O Kruger, Lerato C Tshabalala, Shaik E Hoosain, and SG Le Roux "Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness." (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10447 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Du Plessis A, Sperling P, Beerlink A, Kruger O, Tshabalala LC, Hoosain SE, et al. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness. 2018; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10447. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Du Plessis, A AU - Sperling, P AU - Beerlink, A AU - Kruger, O AU - Tshabalala, Lerato C AU - Hoosain, Shaik E AU - Le Roux, SG AB - The use of microCT of 10 mm coupon samples produced by AM has the potential to provide useful information of mean density and detailed porosity information of the interior of the samples. In addition, the same scan data can be used to provide surface roughness analysis of the as-built surfaces of the same coupon samples. This can be used to compare process parameters or new materials. While surface roughness is traditionally done using tactile probes or with non-contact interferometric techniques, the complex surfaces in AM are sometimes difficult to access and may be very rough, with undercuts and may be difficult to accurately measure using traditional techniques which are meant for smoother surfaces. This standard workflow demonstrates on a coupon sample how to acquire surface roughness results, and compares the results from roughly the same area of the same sample with tactile probe results. The same principle can be applied to more complex parts, keeping in mind the resolution limit vs sample size of microCT. DA - 2018-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - X-ray tomography KW - MicroCT KW - Nondestructive testing KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Quality control KW - Surface roughness LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2018 SM - MethodsX T1 - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness TI - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10447 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record