ResearchSpace

Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kusangaya, S
dc.contributor.author Warburton Toucher, ML
dc.contributor.author Archer van Garderen, Emma
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-25T10:32:43Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-25T10:32:43Z
dc.date.issued 2018-02
dc.identifier.citation Kusangaya, S., Warburton Toucher, M.L. and Archer van Garderen, E. 2018. Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, vol 557, pp 931-946 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0022-1694
dc.identifier.issn 1879-2707
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169418300179
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10416
dc.description Copyright: 2018. Elsevier. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published in Journal of Hydrology, vol 557, pp 931-946 en_US
dc.description.abstract Downscaled General Circulation Models (GCMs) output are used to forecast climate change and provide information used as input for hydrological modelling. Given that our understanding of climate change points towards an increasing frequency, timing and intensity of extreme hydrological events, there is therefore the need to assess the ability of downscaled GCMs to capture these extreme hydrological events. Extreme hydrological events play a significant role in regulating the structure and function of rivers and associated ecosystems. In this study, the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) method was adapted to assess the ability of simulated streamflow (using downscaled GCMs (dGCMs)) in capturing extreme river dynamics (high and low flows), as compared to streamflow simulated using historical climate data from 1960 to 2000. The ACRU hydrological model was used for simulating streamflow for the 13 water management units of the uMngeni Catchment, South Africa. Statistically downscaled climate models obtained from the Climate System Analysis Group at the University of Cape Town were used as input for the ACRU Model. Results indicated that, high flows and extreme high flows (one in ten year high flows/large flood events) were poorly represented both in terms of timing, frequency and magnitude. Simulated streamflow using dGCMs data also captures more low flows and extreme low flows (one in ten year lowest flows) than that captured in streamflow simulated using historical climate data. The overall conclusion was that although dGCMs output can reasonably be used to simulate overall streamflow, it performs poorly when simulating extreme high and low flows. Streamflow simulation from dGCMs must thus be used with caution in hydrological applications, particularly for design hydrology, as extreme high and low flows are still poorly represented. This, arguably calls for the further improvement of downscaling techniques in order to generate climate data more relevant and useful for hydrological applications such as in design hydrology. Nevertheless, the availability of downscaled climatic output provide the potential of exploring climate model uncertainties in different hydro climatic regions at local scales where forcing data is often less accessible but more accurate at finer spatial scales and with adequate spatial detail. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;20999
dc.subject ACRU model en_US
dc.subject Downscaled GCM output en_US
dc.subject High flows en_US
dc.subject Low flows en_US
dc.subject Uncertainty en_US
dc.title Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Kusangaya, S., Warburton Toucher, M., & Archer van Garderen, E. (2018). Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10416 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Kusangaya, S, ML Warburton Toucher, and Emma Archer van Garderen "Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa." (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10416 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Kusangaya S, Warburton Toucher M, Archer van Garderen E. Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa. 2018; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10416. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Kusangaya, S AU - Warburton Toucher, ML AU - Archer van Garderen, Emma AB - Downscaled General Circulation Models (GCMs) output are used to forecast climate change and provide information used as input for hydrological modelling. Given that our understanding of climate change points towards an increasing frequency, timing and intensity of extreme hydrological events, there is therefore the need to assess the ability of downscaled GCMs to capture these extreme hydrological events. Extreme hydrological events play a significant role in regulating the structure and function of rivers and associated ecosystems. In this study, the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) method was adapted to assess the ability of simulated streamflow (using downscaled GCMs (dGCMs)) in capturing extreme river dynamics (high and low flows), as compared to streamflow simulated using historical climate data from 1960 to 2000. The ACRU hydrological model was used for simulating streamflow for the 13 water management units of the uMngeni Catchment, South Africa. Statistically downscaled climate models obtained from the Climate System Analysis Group at the University of Cape Town were used as input for the ACRU Model. Results indicated that, high flows and extreme high flows (one in ten year high flows/large flood events) were poorly represented both in terms of timing, frequency and magnitude. Simulated streamflow using dGCMs data also captures more low flows and extreme low flows (one in ten year lowest flows) than that captured in streamflow simulated using historical climate data. The overall conclusion was that although dGCMs output can reasonably be used to simulate overall streamflow, it performs poorly when simulating extreme high and low flows. Streamflow simulation from dGCMs must thus be used with caution in hydrological applications, particularly for design hydrology, as extreme high and low flows are still poorly represented. This, arguably calls for the further improvement of downscaling techniques in order to generate climate data more relevant and useful for hydrological applications such as in design hydrology. Nevertheless, the availability of downscaled climatic output provide the potential of exploring climate model uncertainties in different hydro climatic regions at local scales where forcing data is often less accessible but more accurate at finer spatial scales and with adequate spatial detail. DA - 2018-02 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - ACRU model KW - Downscaled GCM output KW - High flows KW - Low flows KW - Uncertainty LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2018 SM - 0022-1694 SM - 1879-2707 T1 - Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa TI - Evaluation of uncertainty in capturing the spatial variability and magnitudes of extreme hydrological events for the uMngeni catchment, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10416 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record