ResearchSpace

Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mabaso, M
dc.contributor.author Twala, B
dc.contributor.author Withey, Daniel J
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-18T11:28:43Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-18T11:28:43Z
dc.date.issued 2013-09
dc.identifier.citation Mabaso, M., Twala, B. and Withey, D.J. 2013. Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images. BRICS-CCI & CBIC 2013, Brazil, 8-11 September 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-4799-3194-1
dc.identifier.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6855915/
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.1109/BRICS-CCI-CBIC.2013.106
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10220
dc.description Copyright: 2013 IEEE. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file contains the accepted version of the published item. For access to the published item, please consult the publisher's website. en_US
dc.description.abstract Tracking of multiple bright particles (spots) in fluorescence microscopy image sequences is seen as a crucial step in understanding complex information in the cell. However, fluorescence microscopy generates high a volume of noisy image data that cannot be analysed efficiently by means of manual analysis. In this study we compare the performance of two computer-based tracking methods for tracking of bright particles in fluorescence microscopy image sequences. The methods under comparison are, Interacting Multiple Model filter and Feature Point Tracking. The performance of the methods is validated using synthetic but realistic image sequences and real images. The results from experiments show that the Interacting Multiple Model filter performed best, under the test conditions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;11662
dc.subject Fluorescence microscopy images en_US
dc.subject Feature Point Tracking en_US
dc.subject Interacting Multiple Model filter en_US
dc.subject Electrical engineering en_US
dc.title Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Mabaso, M., Twala, B., & Withey, D. J. (2013). Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images. IEEE. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10220 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Mabaso, M, B Twala, and Daniel J Withey. "Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images." (2013): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10220 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Mabaso M, Twala B, Withey DJ, Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images; IEEE; 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10220 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Mabaso, M AU - Twala, B AU - Withey, Daniel J AB - Tracking of multiple bright particles (spots) in fluorescence microscopy image sequences is seen as a crucial step in understanding complex information in the cell. However, fluorescence microscopy generates high a volume of noisy image data that cannot be analysed efficiently by means of manual analysis. In this study we compare the performance of two computer-based tracking methods for tracking of bright particles in fluorescence microscopy image sequences. The methods under comparison are, Interacting Multiple Model filter and Feature Point Tracking. The performance of the methods is validated using synthetic but realistic image sequences and real images. The results from experiments show that the Interacting Multiple Model filter performed best, under the test conditions. DA - 2013-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Fluorescence microscopy images KW - Feature Point Tracking KW - Interacting Multiple Model filter KW - Electrical engineering LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2013 SM - 978-1-4799-3194-1 T1 - Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images TI - Quantitative comparison of two particle tracking methods in fluorescence microscopy images UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10220 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record